Military Suicide: One More Reason to Abolish War

Military Suicide

The Pentagon issued its annual report recently on suicide in the military, and it provides us with very sad news. Despite spending hundreds of millions of dollars on programs to stem this crisis, the suicide rate for active-duty U.S. troops rose to 28.7 per 100,000 during 2020, up from 26.3 per 100,000 the previous year.

This is the highest rate since 2008, when the Pentagon began keeping detailed records. In a joint statement, U.S. Army Secretary Christine Wormuth and General James McConville, the Army chief of staff, reported that “suicide remains a significant challenge for our Army,” and acknowledged they had no clear understanding of what was causing it.

Perhaps they should take a closer look at the impact of training, arming, and employing young men and women to kill other human beings. There have been countless stories of the trauma caused by these practices.

Most Americans think that sacrificing the mental health and the lives of our men and women in the military is simply the cost of protecting the United States.

Why do most Americans accept this as a cost of maintaining national security? Have we been brainwashed by the deep pockets and widespread power of the military-industrial complex as President Eisenhower forewarned in his farewell speech in 1961?

Most Americans think that sacrificing the mental health and the lives of our men and women in the military is simply the cost of protecting the United States. Some die on land, some on the sea, some in the air, and some will take their own lives. But do we really need to sacrifice the lives of so many people, in this country and in other lands, to keep us safe, secure, and free? Can’t we find a better way to these goals?

Advocates of a democratic world federation believe that we can move from the law of force, which relies on the sacrifice of lives, to the force of law where problems are solved in a court of law.

If you think this is impossible, consider the fact that, before, during, and after the American revolution, states that formed the United States engaged in armed conflict with one another. George Washington was extremely worried about the stability of the nation under the weak central government provided by the Articles of Confederation, and for good reason.

But, when the constitution was ratified and the nation moved from a confederation to a federation, the states began resolving their disputes under the authority of the federal government rather than on the battlefield.

In 1799, for example, it was the new federal government that satisfactorily settled a lengthy interstate dispute that, over a 30-year period, had erupted into bloody struggle between armed forces from Connecticut and Pennsylvania.

Furthermore, look at the history of the European Union. After centuries of bitter fighting among European nation states, the European Union was established with the goal of ending the many bloody wars among them that had culminated in the disaster of World War II. Although the European Union is not yet a federation of nations, its integration of previously feuding countries has laid the groundwork for federation and has been remarkably successful in halting war among them.

Can you imagine a world that solves its problems in a court of law instead of crushing the lives of millions of men and women? Imagine these steps to it.

First, we transform the United Nations from a confederation to a federation of nations with a constitution that guarantees universal human rights, protects our global environment, and outlaws war and weapons of mass destruction.

Then we create the global institutions needed to establish and enforce world law with justice. If a government official breaks the law, that individual would be arrested, tried, and if found guilty, put in prison. We can end war and, also, secure justice.

Of course, we’ll need checks and balances to make sure no country or authoritarian leader can dominate a world federation.

But we can make the world a better place without training, arming, and employing young men and women to kill people of other lands and, thereby, leaving our soldiers to face the consequences, including not only death on the battlefield, but mental anguish and suicide.

Donna Park

DISCLAIMER: The opinions expressed here are those of the individual contributor(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the LA Progressive, its publisher, editor or any of its other contributors.

Donna Park is currently the Board Chair of Citizens for Global Solutions (CGS) Action Network. She chairs the Action Network’s Executive Committee and the joint CGS Administrative Committee. She is a member of the Finance Committee, the Leadership Committee, the Program Committee, the Development Committee and the Strategy Committee. She is a founding member of the Greater Cincinnati Chapter of Citizens for Global Solutions. She is a member of the Cincinnati Peace Committee sponsored by the Intercommunity Justice and Peace Center (IJPC) and received the Margaret Fuller Peace Award from IJPC in 2018. Donna is a student of Nonviolent Communication as developed by Marshall B. Rosenberg, PhD.


Suicide is a serious concern in the military community. If you are in crisis, or you know someone who is, there are immediate resources available to support you or your loved ones. The Military Crisis Line connects those in need to a trained counselor with a single phone call or click of a mouse. This confidential, immediate help is available 24/7 at no cost to active duty, Guard and reserve members, their families and friends. Contact the Military Crisis Line.



And receive the latest blog posts from Military Truth in your inbox! We work hard to find articles that will provide information you need but won't flood your inbox.

Thank you for subscribing! We look forward to sharing posts that will help you make this important decision.

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This